Emerging Leadership Styles in Education: A Shift Towards Innovation and Collaboration

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Anees ul Husnain Shah Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Education Lahore, D.G Khan Campus
  • Dr. Sabir Hussain PST, School Education Department (SED), Government of Punjab
  • Amna Naz M.Phil. Education Scholar, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KPK

Keywords:

Transformational Leadership, Distributed Leadership, Servant Leadership, Agile Leadership, Data-Driven Leadership, Human-Centered Leadership, Educational Leadership, School Culture, Teacher Satisfaction, Student Engagement

Abstract

This study focused on the applicability of new forms of leadership in the education field: transformational leadership, distributed leadership, servant leadership, agile leadership, data-driven leadership, and human-centered leadership. This study was conducted in Multan city, Pakistan. It employed a mixed methods approach of qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys to capture the opinions of school leaders, teachers, and staff. The findings indicated that transformational and distributed leadership had the most significant impact in supporting the school culture, teacher satisfaction, and pupil engagement, and data-driven leadership was the least effective. These findings are relevant for Pakistani schools, which seek to adopt contemporary pedagogical leadership theories for creating their learning outcomes. The research findings suggest that the leadership development programs in Multan should be centered on transformational and distributed leadership models. However, they should also combine servant- and human-oriented leadership to help staff flourish.

References

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.

Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Hay, M. (2006). The emotional intelligence of leaders. Leadership in Action, 26(1), 22-26.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Denning, S. (2018). The age of agile: How smart companies are transforming the way work gets done. AMACOM.

Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2022). Relation of principal instructional leadership, school climate, teacher job performance and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 148-166.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11-24.

Hussain, S., Ahmad, M., Zaman, F. U., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Comparative Study of Administrators' Supervisory Skills and Teachers' Pedagogical Skills Towards Quality Education in Public and Punjab Education Foundation Funded Schools at Secondary Level. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 10(2), 329-347.

Johnson, T. K. A. (2024). Humanization in Higher Education: A Grounded Theory Study on the Impact That Customer Service Practices Have on the Student Academic Journey (Doctoral dissertation, Morgan State University).

Kezar, A. J. (Ed.). (2023). Rethinking leadership in a complex, multicultural, and global environment: New concepts and models for higher education. Taylor & Francis.

Laub, J. A. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the Servant Organizational Leadership Assessment (SOLA) instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(2), 308-A.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational leadership research in education. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199.

Li, Y., & Karanxha, Z. (2024). Literature review of transformational school leadership: Models and effects on student achievement (2006–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 52-74.

Lizier, A., Brooks, F., & Bizo, L. (2024). Importance of clarity, hierarchy, and trust in implementing distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(4), 901-915.

Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systems-thinking framework for data-driven decision-making. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 18(4), 258-273.

Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52(3), 231-242.

Nadeem, M. (2024). Distributed leadership in educational contexts: A catalyst for school improvement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100835.

Puspitadani, E., Yudea, F., & Loo, F. (2022). Educational Leadership and Learning Quality: The Influence of the Princi-pal's Leadership Style on Teacher Performance. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 11(3), 206-220.

Richardson, L. E. (2024). The experience of organizational leaders with decision-making in a crisis (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).

Riswanti Rini, R. (2022). Principal's transformational leadership in education era 4.0: A literature review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5, 2852-2860.

Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Distributed leadership in practice. Teachers College Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Shah, D. M. A. ul H. ., Hussain, D. S. ., & Naz, A. . (2025). Emerging Leadership Styles in Education: A Shift Towards Innovation and Collaboration. Al-Aijaz Research Journal of Islamic Studies & Humanities , 9(1), 296-302. Retrieved from http://arjish.com/index.php/arjish/article/view/812

Most read articles by the same author(s)