Generative AI in Secondary Educators' Perspectives on Academic Learning and Integrity

Authors

  • Misbah Yasmeen Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Fazaia Bilquis College of Education for Women, PAF Nur khan, Rawalpindi.
  • Dr. Mahek Arshad Controller of examination, Fazaia Bilquis College of Education for Women, PAF Nur khan, Rawalpindi.
  • Azra Jamil Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Fazaia Bilquis College of Education for Women, PAF Nur khan, Rawalpindi.
  • Naeem Akhtar PhD Scholar, My University, Assistant Professor, IMCB, F-8/4 Islamabad.

Keywords:

Generative AI, ChatGPT, Secondary education, Academic integrity, Digital learning, Secondary learning institutions

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI), as represented by products like ChatGPT, has matured and assumed the role of already being a powerful agent in a range of industries including the academic sphere of the secondary learning institutions. LLMs can be used in numerous applications best exemplified by the widely used ChatGPT, an application of Gen AI that employs LLMs to produce natural language outputs that are as good as human writing, for tasks as diverse as answering challenging questions and writing code. The use of these tools hereby raised questions of how they really shape the process of academic teaching and learning more under focus. However, quite a few research concentrating on the influence of such systems on students’ performance and the usage of such systems. This study therefore examines the impact of GPT tools on secondary education, aiming to address the following research questions: What impact does the integration of GPTs have on the delivery and receipt of education in secondary school? Some of questions are regarding school educators’ perceptions of the impacts of GPTs on educational practices. This qualitative study makes use of semi structured interviews with educators from the Islamabad FG school where GPT has been implemented. Transcriptions were made from the gathered data and OpenAI’s Whisper was used to detect relevant patterns and trends at the same time. Data analysis was done through distinguishing the themes, and then categorizing the data into the relevant codes. The research highlights the profound dual nature of GPT when the technology has many opportunities to advance the educational process and individualization of learning, it also has multiple problematic aspects such as academic dishonesty, overdependence on the AI, and changes to valuable soft skills. These results contribute to the literature on digital learning pointing to the instructional and constructive use of technologies like GenAI. However, the advances made and the integration of GPT in our daily lives are inevitable, and returning to prior state is out of the question. The research uses a qualitative approach and includes semi structured interviews with educators from Islamabad FG school, who have implemented GPT in their programs. The collected data were transcribed and analyzed using OpenAI’s Whisper to But it is vital to embrace future-oriented opportunities of AI while experiencing its negative effects for the future and development in this age of AI. The study underscores the need to establish concrete guidelines that will enable the achievement of the benefits addressed under GPT while at the same time avoiding distortion of the educational processes. Therefore, this study offers important findings to educators, policymakers and scholars about the ethical and optimal integration of AI in secondary learning institutions.

References

Aghaee, N., (2024) Using Digital Tools for Information Management in Higher Education. In European Conference on Knowledge Management, Vol 25, No. 1, pp. 1-9.

Alam, A. (2021) Possibilities and Apprehensions in the Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Education, International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) ss. 1-8. IEEE.

Anderson, P., Baker, T., & Clark, J. (2021). Teaching ethics in the AI age: Strategies for responsible technology use in classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 45-57.

Ashraf, Muztagh, & Salami (2014). Title of the Article. Journal of Technology in Education.

Bahrini, A., Khamoshifar, M., Abbasimehr, H., Riggs, R.J., Esmaeili, M., Majdabadkohne, R.M. and Pasehvar, M. (2023) ChatGPT: Applications, opportunities, and threats. In 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, IEEE, pp 274-279.

Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A. and Ramasamy, L.K., (2023) The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. In Frontiers in Education, Vol 8, pp 1206936.

Garcia, M., Johnson, K., & Patel, R. (2022). AI in education: Bridging gaps in learning. Educational Review Quarterly, 56(2), 12-23.

Heaven, D. (2021). "Generative AI in the Classroom."

Holmes, W., et al. (2019). AI and Education: Opportunities and Risks.

Huang, L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Generative AI in secondary education: Opportunities and risks. AI in Education Journal, 41(3), 78-91.

Johnson, L., & Becker, S. (2021). The future of AI in education: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Sciences, 49(1), 112-131.

Jones, P., & Lee, A. (2021). "Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Secondary Educators' Perspectives." Journal of Academic Integrity, 14(1), 45-6

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E. and Krusche, S., 2023. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, Vol 103, p.102274.

Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Navigating ethical dilemmas in AI-driven classrooms. Ethics and Education, 35(2), 134-150.

Kurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., Zailer, G. and Barak-Medina, E. (2024) Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Opportunities. Education Sciences, Vol 14, No. 5, pp 503.

Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2016). "AI and Cheating in Education."

Lucas, H.C., (2016) Technology and the Disruption of Higher Education: Saving the American University. CreateSpace Independent Pub. [E-book]. Hackensack, New Jersey: World Scientific.

McGee, P. (2013). Ethics in Academic Integrity.

Mullen, R. (2020). "Educators’ Views on Emerging Technologies."

Smith, J., & Taylor, L. (2022). "AI in the Classroom: Opportunities and Challenges for Secondary Education." Educational Technology Review, 28(2), 120-132.

Smith, R., Williams, S., & Taylor, L. (2022). Plagiarism redefined: The impact of AI-generated content in education. Academic Integrity Journal, 28(4), 67-85.

Stevens, A., & Richards, P. (2023). Detecting AI-generated content: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(1), 89-102.

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A. and McLaughlan, P., (2023) ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, Vol 6, No. 1, pp 1-10.

Thorne, S., (2024) Understanding the Interplay between Trust, Reliability, and Human Factors in the Age of Generative AI. International Journal of Simulation--Systems, Science & Technology, Vol 25, No 1.

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M.A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D.T., Huang, R. and Agyemang, B., 2023. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart learning environments, Vol 10, No. 1, p.15.

Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Vol 23, No. 1, pp. 1-23.

Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic Review of AI in Higher Education.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Yasmeen , M. ., Arshad , D. M. ., Jamil, A. ., & Akhtar, N. . (2024). Generative AI in Secondary Educators’ Perspectives on Academic Learning and Integrity. Al-Aijaz Research Journal of Islamic Studies & Humanities , 8(1), 119-128. Retrieved from https://arjish.com/index.php/arjish/article/view/726