The Impact of Multimodal Communication on Learners’ Engagement and Comprehension in Online Learning Environments among Science Students at the Secondary Level in Islamabad
Keywords:
Key Points Multimodality, Multimodal Communication, Learning Environment, Science Student secondary LevelAbstract
This study looks at how multimodal communication affects secondary-level science students' engagement and comprehension in online learning environments. In online education, multimodal communication—which combines multiple information delivery modalities, including visual, aural, and interactive elements—has grown in popularity, especially in science courses that frequently need for intricate explanations and conceptual comprehension. This study investigates the effects of these multimodal approaches on students' motivation, engagement, and understanding of scientific ideas. Surveys and comprehension tests were used to collect data from a sample of scientific students in secondary school who participated in multimedia-rich online learning modules. According to the findings, multimodal communication greatly raises student interest and comprehension of scientific material. Results show that, in contrast to conventional text-based approaches, visual aids, interactive simulations, and additional audio explanations increase comprehension and retention rates. These findings highlight the potential of multimodal communication as an effective instrument for maximizing secondary online science teaching, with useful ramifications for teachers, instructional designers, and educational policymakers looking to improve online learning environments.
References
Ashraf, M., Muztagh, M., & Salami, M. (2014). The role of multimedia in enhancing students’ engagement. Journal of Educational Technology.
Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners (2 ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Birch, D. & Gardiner, M. (2005). Students' perceptions of technology-based marketing courses, paper presented at the ANZMAC Conference: Broadening the Boundaries, Fremantle, Western Australia, 5-7 December
Cronin, J. J. (2009). Upgrading to Web 2.0: An experiential project to build a marketing Wiki. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 66-75.
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.
Fadel, C. (2008). Multimodal Learning Through Media: What the Research Says. San Jose, CA: Cisco Systems
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference.
Hazari, S. (2004). Applying instructional design theories to improve efficacy of technology-assisted presentations. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 18(2), 24-33.
Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446-474.
Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.
Jochems, W., van Merriënboer, J., & Koper, R. (2004). Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology, and organization. Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2014). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record.
Moreno, R. (2002). Who learns best with multiple representations? Cognitive theory implications for individual differences in multimedia learning, paper presented at the EDMEDIA 2002 Conference: Denver, Colorado, USA, June.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychological Review, 19, 309-326.
Najjar, L. J. (1998). Principles of educational multimedia user interface design. Human Factors, 40(2), 311-323
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
Sarasin, L. C. (1999). Learning styles perspectives: Impact in the classroom. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
