ARABIC-1 Jurisprudencial Differences Between Sahabah (R.A), Causes and Effects: An Analytical Study

Abstract

One of the main reasons for the features of Islamic jurisprudence is the differences between different schools of jurisprudence which get Oxygen from the theology of Sahaba and this is certainly a mercy for the ummah. This difference of opinion among the scholars on the rules of jurisprudence is in fact a natural consequence of the ijtihad differences of the Sahabah era. People used to refer directly to Sahib Shariat(ﷺ), usually the answers to the questions would come throughout the would solve the problems through their  Ijtihad which have the status of revelation. Necessity was very rare at that time and in practical life the Companions kept an eye on every single action and deed of the Holy Prophet (ﷺ) because the pattern was his own and each Companion understood and preserved his instructions, fatwas and issues according to his own understanding and signs. The Qur'an would determine the value and status of each action (abahat, istihab, wajub, etc.). But when the Prophet (ﷺ) passed away, unsolved issues were resolved through ijtihad. In this research Paper, this theme has been analyzed briefly by the authentic resources.