URDU-6 An analytical study of Ibn-e-Hazam’s Confrontation on the Suspicions Ahadith about Sadd-ul-Zarai

Authors

  • Fakharuddin Ph.D Scholar, Department of Uloom Islamiya, The Islamiya University of Bahawalpur
  • Muhammad Imran Assistant Professor, Department of Uloom Islamiya, The Islamiya University of Bahawalpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53575/u6.v4.01.81-90

Keywords:

Sadd uzzaraey, Ibn e hazam, Fath uzzaraey, Islamic jurists

Abstract

It is only the comprehension of Islamic in the legislation in the world that it encompasses the change, evolution or developments being made in different areas of life to accommodate the changes   inegislation or to address the changes, Islamic jurists laid down different principles of fiqah.one of these principle is sad u-zaraey which is known as the “prohibition of evasive legal devices”. As difference in opinion is also existing in all the areas of life, similarly difference of opinions is existing among the Islamic jurists in describing this principle as well. One of the jurists who are possessing the counter narrative of sad u-zaraey is ibn e hazam. In this article research has been made in order to elaborate the ibn e hazam,s point of view about sadd u zaraey and also the vice versa opinion of other jusrists. It is also discussed with example that how the principle of sad u-zaraey is important in Islamic legislation.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

din, F., & Imran, M. (2020). URDU-6 An analytical study of Ibn-e-Hazam’s Confrontation on the Suspicions Ahadith about Sadd-ul-Zarai. Al-Aijaz Research Journal of Islamic Studies & Humanities , 4(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.53575/u6.v4.01.81-90